However, the above mentioned observation is without prejudice on the legal rights on the parties, arising out with the over marriage of the few, if any, pending before the competent court of legislation. Read more
Article 199 of your Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other adequate remedy is provided by legislation." It is actually properly-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust available remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether those remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more
10 . Const. P. 235/2025 (S.B.) Atif S/o Latif V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The law enjoins the police for being scrupulously fair towards the offender along with the Magistracy is to make sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court together with from other courts Nonetheless they have did not have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court.
Should the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC may possibly dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't experienced an opportunity to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In a few cases, the NIRC might allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is generally only performed In case the employee can show that that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. During the present case, the parties were allowed to steer evidence along with the petitioner company responded towards the allegations therefore they were well conscious of the allegations and led the evidence as a result this point is ofno use to get appeared into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more
Unfortunately, that was not real. Just two months after being placed with the Roe family, the Roe’s son told his parents that the boy experienced molested him. The boy was arrested two days later, and admitted to obtaining sexually molested the couple’s son several times.
To the foregoing reasons the moment suit is dismissed with no order regarding cost. Office to prepare decree in the above mentioned terms. Read more
All executive and judicial authorities throughout Pakistan are obligated to act in support with the Supreme Court, making sure the enforcement of its judgments. As being the Supreme Court could be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has actually been arrived at, the decision with the Supreme Court needs to get taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) from the Constitution. Read more
The law as founded in previous court rulings; like common legislation, which springs from judicial decisions and tradition.
In certain jurisdictions, case legislation could be applied to ongoing adjudication; for example, criminal proceedings or family law.
Binding Precedent – A rule or principle recognized by a court, which other courts are obligated to stick to.
162 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It's get more info properly-settled that the civil servants must first go after internal appeals within 90 days. Should the appeal isn't decided within that timeframe, he/she will then technique the service tribunal to challenge the first order. Once they do so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, as the 90 days for that department to act has already expired. Within the aforesaid proposition, we are guided through the decision with the Supreme Court within the case of Dr.
The different roles of case legislation in civil and common law traditions create differences in the best way that courts render decisions. Common regulation courts generally explain in detail the legal rationale driving their decisions, with citations of both legislation and previous relevant judgments, and infrequently interpret the broader legal principles.
In determining whether employees of DCFS are entitled to absolute immunity, which is generally held by certain government officials acting within the scope of their employment, the appellate court referred to case legislation previously rendered on similar cases.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming to the main case, It's also a properly-proven proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to succeed in a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence within the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary get support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of your charge, however, that is issue into the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-value the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings within the evidence.